Evidence should be useful—and inspectable.

This policy explains how Mojoflow creates and maintains public insights, field guides, case narratives, benchmark research, and AI-assisted material.

01

Experience and authorship

Every substantive insight names an accountable author or Mojoflow practice. First-hand experience, analysis, and third-party facts are distinguished.

02

Primary evidence

Claims that can materially affect a decision should be supported by primary or authoritative sources wherever practical. Sources are linked close to the relevant content.

03

AI assistance

AI may support research organization, analysis, drafting, accessibility, or quality checks. A person remains accountable for factual review, judgment, source selection, and publication.

04

Dates and updates

Articles display publication dates. Material updates should change the modified date and preserve the meaning of previously cited evidence.

05

Corrections

Material errors are corrected promptly. Readers can report a concern to info@mojoflow.ca with the page, claim, and supporting evidence.

06

Research integrity

Benchmark publications disclose method, sample, dates, definitions, exclusions, limitations, and sponsorship. Mojoflow does not fabricate findings or present marketing opinion as independent evidence.

Questions, corrections, or source requests

Email info@mojoflow.ca. Include the URL and enough context for us to evaluate the request.

Bring us the decision behind the research.

Bring the mandate, the mess, or the ambition. Leave with a sharper view of the next move.

Book a strategy call (opens in a new tab)Prepare a mandate brief